Injured In A Car Accident In West Virginia? Know Your Legal Rights!

Kingwood Car Accident

Morgantown WV car accident

Take a moment to reflect back on what happened at the instant of the collision, while your mind and body were still in the process of reacting to the traumatic event. Your initial thoughts most likely turned to immediate needs like assessing your own physical condition and, if possible, deciding whether to stay in the vehicle or get out of it. You may have called 911 to report the collision and requested emergency medical support. You may have even been able to check on the physical condition of the other persons involved in the collision. If you were coherent and realized some unsafe condition still existed, like your vehicle being in a dangerous position on the road, or you smelled gasoline, you may have felt that you needed to take additional steps to protect yourself and others from further injury. Little consideration, if any, was probably given to how you thought others would view your immediate reactions to the collision and the actions you took immediately following the collision. All your actions or omissions (your failure to act) will have an effect on your ability to pursue your legal rights for full and fair compensation for your injuries.

West Virginia law provides that you have two years from the date of the auto collision to take legal action (i.e., file a lawsuit) against responsible individuals and companies, including insurance companies, to seek compensation for the damages (i.e., your injuries and losses) you sustained in the auto collision. If your child is injured in a collision, your child will have two years from the date of adulthood to file such claim. Waiting until your child is an adult, however, creates a significant loss of evidence you will need to prove your child’s claim. For adults, if you do not file a lawsuit within the two-year statute of limitations period, your claim will be forever time barred.

Two years may sound like a long time from now, but believe me, it is not when considering all the things that must be done to secure your legal rights against the responsible parties. Every day that you wait to seek legal counsel equates to a loss of opportunity to obtain full compensation for your injuries. In reality, it is the first 60 to 90 days following your auto collision that will make or break your case. It is within this shorter time period that necessary evidence and testimony must be secured, treatment rendered and medical opinions obtained. If you wait until after this time period has passed, and you have not developed your claim properly, it will make the job of even a good lawyer very hard to obtain a full recovery for you. Worse yet, if you wait until close to the two-year statute of limitations period to consult with a lawyer, it is almost guaranteed that your claim will be compromised. It is somewhat like getting cancer diagnosed early — your chances of improvement are greater the earlier the diagnosis is made. So, don’t wait to get your legal claim diagnosed by a qualified lawyer.

In a typical auto injury case, the injured person is entitled to pursue compensation for their past and future pain and suffering, past and future medical bills, past and future lost wages, and their loss of enjoyment of life. If the injuries are very serious and diminish the relationship with a married spouse, loss of consortium (physical and emotional intimacy and services) damages may be awarded to the spouse for those losses they have sustained stemming from your injuries.

Finally, if the at-fault driver was intoxicated or was guilty of grossly negligent behavior, punitive damages may also be awarded in a court of law. With each category of damages, however, there are complex laws and trial court procedures that must be strictly followed in order to prove your injuries in a court of law.

If you are unrepresented, there will be no one to advise you on the law and to ensure that you have met all your legal obligations — any failure on your part to follow these strict rules will have an adverse impact on your auto injury claim. Remember, only those damages that can be proven in a court of law will be considered for compensation.

This information has been provided by the Robinette Legal Group, PLLC as a public service and does not in any way establish a lawyer/client relationship, but if we can be of any further assistance to you, it would be our pleasure to speak with you personally about your injury claim.  You may reach us at http://www.robinettelaw.com or call our law office at 1-304-594-1800.

Don’t Sabotage Your Personal Injury Claim

Above all, be Honest!

The number one way to ruin your otherwise legitimate claim is to lie about anything that relates to your claim. The veracity, that is the truthfulness of your story of your injury, has to be ultimately believed by a jury, and if you lie about even a seemingly insignificant thing, you may not be believed about your injury. As a true illustration, a client lied to the police about who was driving the vehicle to shield blame from the actual driver who wasn’t supposed to be driving. Irrespective of whether my client or her friend was the driver, it should not have mattered since the collision was caused by the driver of the other vehicle that ran a stop sign. The insurance company and defense lawyer used the lie to refute my client’s injury claims, even though her injuries were legitimate, permanent, and painful. Ultimately, the jury did not fully believe the magnitude of the client’s injuries because she had lied to the police.

If you are the type of person that doesn’t like this type of confrontation, you are going to feel nervous when the insurance adjuster calls to have a chat about your injury claim.  Sure, you want to tell the truth, but you also want to receive just compensation, and the questions that are asked make you feel uncomfortable (if not intimidated).  When it comes to giving information that will be scrutinized by the insurance adjuster and defense lawyer, guessing about information is not a good idea. You will be characterized as someone who just “makes up” information to fit their financial motives, or worse, you will be considered a liar.

While lying is an act of commission, that is what you do say knowing it is untrue; concealing information is an act of omission, which is what you didn’t say knowing it to be true. Both are wrong and both will ruin your auto injury claim. Before you decide to discuss your case with the insurance adjuster you ought to give careful consideration to the difficulties you will face without legal counsel. It is easy to get confused and say the wrong thing when the insurance adjuster is firing questions at you and you feel the sense of urgency to answer each one, hoping your responses will satisfy the insurance adjuster. Take my word for it, the insurance adjuster is laying traps for you to fall into and will allow you to hang yourself if you are not very careful.

Don’t Exaggerate or Minimize Your Injuries

If you try to play your injuries down, like a lot of people do, you will not be taken seriously. And when your injuries don’t get better, you will be accused of being a malingerer (a person who fakes their injuries). But, on the other hand, if you exaggerate at all the symptoms of your injuries at the outset, you will be labeled as a faker or money-grubber. For instance, if you are losing quality sleep because of neck pain from the auto collision, you should not say that you haven’t slept a wink for two nights. You should say you have tried to sleep, but could not get restful sleep because of the neck pain. Because your symptoms change, sometimes day to day, it is not advisable to speak with an insurance adjuster early on after your auto collision. Of course, it is best to consult an attorney before you speak with an insurance adjuster.

When you visit the emergency room or medical express clinic for your injuries you are routinely given a form that tells you what is expected of you in treating your injuries. If you are prescribed medications it is expected that you will promptly go to a pharmacy and fill the prescription and take the medicine. If you don’t, you will not be taken seriously when you tell an adjuster or jury that you had pain. Likewise, if the physician instructs you to apply hot or cold compresses to your neck and stretch every day, and you don’t, others will minimize your injuries. Many people work in pain, even with a lot of pain. I know many persons who have worked for years with chronic, constant pain. But early on in your assessment, if you attempt to do normal things in pain, you will be viewed as normal. Pain is invisible; nobody can see your pain. What they can see is how you respond to the pain. So if your conduct resembles that of a normal person, even though you are in pain, your injury will be minimized and so will your compensation.

Don’t Give a Recorded Statement or Sign Anything without Counsel

We have all watched the news programs that tell of the latest investigations or indictments for wrongdoing. Have you noticed how many times the newscaster stated that the accused or involved party was unavailable for comment, or they have no comment? Well, there’s a good reason for this – they don’t have all the information and they know that if they say something wrong, it will be used against them. I have previously explained the hidden dangers of giving a recorded statement to an insurance adjuster. There are times when giving a recorded statement to an adjuster may be in your best interest, but only an experienced lawyer will know when to do so.

When you are injured in an auto collision, which was not your fault, you are viewed in the eyes of the law as a victim. The insurance adjuster, however, doesn’t view you as a victim, but a claimant, a money-grubber (someone who is motivated to get something they don’t deserve). The more the insurance adjusters cheat you out of your recovery, the more applause and promotions they receive. When you are told that you won’t get any recovery until you sign a medical release, you feel like you don’t have any choice in the matter. But when you sign the medical release, an entire world of your personal information is given to the individual who looks on you as a money-grubber, and your records will be used to prove it. I have seen this scenario work out hundreds of times. The motivation of the insurance company to get your records is to disprove or minimize your claim. Additionally, all your medical history will be recorded on national insurance indexes that the insurance industry uses to defeat claims. You have to ask yourself whether giving the insurance adjuster access to all your medical records is necessary and wise.

Hire a Good Lawyer

There is a common saying in the practice of law, “Don’t hire yourself to act as your own lawyer.” The reason for this is that the client lacks objectivity. Objectivity means that you can analyze the law correctly and evaluate the facts of the case in a neutral way. That way you are not overlooking a key weakness in your case. I have known many ne’er-do-wellers who represented themselves, and even filed their own lawsuits, but in the end finally come around to the obvious need to have a professional oversee and handle their legal matters. If you had a common cold, you would likely go to the local grocery store and buy some cold medicine. But if you had a severe laceration on the leg, you wouldn’t likely stitch your leg. Many people try to represent themselves because they think it will be like treating a common cold. By the time they realize that a professional is needed, a lot of damage to their claim has already occurred.

By now you know that handling your own auto injury claim has significant challenges, and you decide to hire a lawyer. Keep in mind, though, not every lawyer who takes personal injury cases has the necessary experience to provide excellent representation. There are plenty of average lawyers who are looking for quick answers to solve their client’s complex problems, because they don’t have the experience and knowledge to answer their own questions. Hiring an inexperienced, but well-intended lawyer, to handle your case will be no substitute for an experienced lawyer with a thorough knowledge of auto injury law, and trials and appeals. And, if you expect to collect any money from the insurance company, you had better hire a lawyer that knows insurance law, too. Without question, having no lawyer is a worse mistake than hiring an inexperienced lawyer. But since you are wisely choosing to hire a lawyer, hire a good one.

Not Deciding is a Decision

Last, but not least, you will sabotage your claim if you remain undecided. This often resembles “doing nothing” about your claim. The problem is that “doing nothing” is actually “doing something” after all, but not the “something” that will help your case. While you wait week after week, month after month, the clock is ticking on the statute of limitations on your claim, witnesses vital to your claim are not interviewed and move out of the area, evidence about the collision is destroyed, the police officer can’t remember the collision anymore, the time period when you are expected to seek treatment has passed, and a whole host of other negative things happen to your claim while you are making no decisions. So, as it turns out, waiting around for things to get better on their own actually worsens the situation. Many individuals, though, have difficulty taking the first step to meet with a lawyer. You’ll be glad you did.

Robinette Legal Group, PLLC:  We’re here to help.

If we can be of any further assistance to you, it would be our pleasure to speak with you personally about your injury claim.  You may reach us at http://www.robinettelaw.com or call our law office at 1-304-594-1800.

WV Worker Killed in Elevator Accident at Preston Memorial Hospital

Clifford Likens, 62, of Tunnelton,  WV died instantly Monday morning in an elevator shaft at Preston Memorial Hospital while on duty with the maintenance department.  Preston County Sheriff ’s deputies and OSHA are investigating what appears to have been an accident.  Melissa Lockwood, CEO of Preston Memorial said Likens “was killed in the course of his job duties” and had worked at the hospital for six years.  She further commented,  “He was a valuable member of our team. It is a very sad time for Preston Memorial Hospital.”  Likens is survived by his wife of thirty years and a daughter in Terra Alta, WV, a son who attends WVU, and a grandchild.  Likens is remembered as a man with no bad habits who had a knack for small engine repair. “He could fix anything,” friends said. “He was an A’ number one fellow.”

Sgt. R.V. Turner, of the Preston County Sheriff ’s Department, said he is continuing the investigation into Likens’ death and will continue to interview those who witnessed Monday’s accident.
Kingwood firefighters and a KAMP Ambulance crew were called to the hospital, on South Price Street in Kingwood, at about 11:36 a.m. Monday for an elevator rescue.   So far, the results of the investigation indicate that Likens had climbed into the elevator shaft to retrieve a set of keys, and was impacted by the elevator as it moved through that shaft.  Likens was pronounced dead at the scene. Turner said he died instantly.

Submitted by http://www.robinettelaw.com, workplace injury/wrongful death lawyers.

 

Workplace Injuries: NFL Faces New Lawsuit By More Than 100 Ex-players For Football Related Brain Injuries

ATLANTA — More than 100 former NFL players have filed a federal lawsuit in Atlanta claiming that pro football didn’t properly protect its players from concussions.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include former Atlanta Falcon Jamal Anderson, ex-Georgia star Lindsey Scott and veteran quarterback Don Majkowski.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Georgia, claims the league failed to protect NFL players from brain injuries linked to footballrelated concussions.

They are among more than 1,000 former NFL players suing the league. The cases say not enough was done to inform players about the dangers of concussions in the past, and not enough is done to take care of them today.

The league has said any allegation that the league intentionally sought to mislead players is without merit.  AP

Robinette Legal Group, PLLC

Another Former NFL Player Ends His Life Due to Football Related Brain Injuries

Dave Duerson made it easy to understand why he was ending his tortured life.     Before the former Chicago Bears star fired a bullet into his chest last year, he left word with his family to have his brain examined for damage he believed was caused by repeated blows to the head from his hell-bent style on the football field.

Junior Seau was an even bigger NFL star, and he ended his life Wednesday in much the same way as Duerson and former Atlanta Falcons safety Ray Easterling: Self-inflicted gunshot wounds.     Now friends wonder if the San Diego icon hoped his death might leave a greater legacy than any of his amazing feats on the gridiron.     Former player Kyle Turley has no doubt that Seau wanted to make sure his brain could be studied for the telltale signs of football related trauma.     “I don’t care what anybody says,” Turley told The Associated Press in an interview Thursday. “I know why he did it.”

Seau’s death was ruled a suicide by the San Diego County medical examiner’s office after an autopsy Thursday. Officials were awaiting a decision by the family on whether to turn over Seau’s brain to unidentified outside researchers for study. A more in-depth investigative report could take up to 90 days.     Seau, 43, was one of the NFL’s most rugged players, a fierce-hitting linebacker selected for the Pro Bowl a dozen years in a row. He played for three teams over two decades, far longer than the average football career, before finally retiring in 2010 at age 40.

Three years later, he decided to end his life. There were signs of trouble away from the field: A divorce and a domestic violence charge involving his girlfriend, though he was never formally charged.     Seau ran a restaurant and a clothing line after his retirement.     Hours before his arrest, his car plunged over a 100-foot cliff in what some speculated was an attempt to kill himself. Seau survived with only minor injuries and insisted that he had simply fallen asleep at the wheel.     Seau never indicated publicly he was having trouble with life after the NFL  because of all those head injuries, and his family said he seemed happy.

That’s a far cry from Easterling, who died last month at age 62. He suffered from dementia and led a lawsuit filed by a number of prominent retired players, claiming the league didn’t do enough to deal with concussion-related injuries.     Notably, Seau didn’t join that lawsuit. Also, it’s not known if he wanted Boston University, which has been conducting research into football-related head trauma, to study his brain for signs of chronic traumatic encephalopathy, a progressive degenerative disease that can be caused by multiple concussions and only detected after death.   AP

The Robinette Legal Group, PLLC

Your Car Has Been Wrecked – Answers to Questions About Your Insurance Claim

Q.  For what damages can an accident victim be compensated through a lawsuit?

A.  Accident victims can be compensated for economic damages:  actual dollar losses such as medical bills, lost wages, and lost future income earning ability.  Pain, suffering, humiliation, loss of enjoyment of life, and grief over the loss of a loved one are some of the non-economic losses for which a person may receive compensation.  Punitive damages are also awarded in rare cases which serve to punish a defendant for extreme negligence and serve to deter future similar conduct by that defendant and others.

Q.  Why is it important to follow all my doctor’s recommendations for treatment after a car or work accident?

A.  If you are hurt in an accident, it is critical to seek prompt and appropriate medical treatment.  Don’t allow any interruption in your treatment without a good reason.  If you skip appointments or fail to follow through with prescribed treatments, the insurance company and their defense lawyers will argue that you must have felt that you were fully recovered from your injuries and had no need of continued treatment.

Q.  Is it true that insurance computers do most of the assessment of what my claim is worth?

A.  Much of the work that was done by insurance adjusters to evaluate claims in the past is now done by computers.  At least 70% of insurance companies now use computer software programs to determine case value.  Your doctor will record your injuries using the International Classifications of Diseases codes.  These codes are then entered into the insurance claims evaluation program.  If the required documentation is not entered into the computer in language and codes the program understands, the program will not properly evaluate your injury and may deny the compensation due to you.  A knowledgeable personal injury attorney will know how to present the medical evidence the computers are designed to recognize.

Q.  I have been injured in a car accident and am considering filing a lawsuit.  What information do I need to record to have a successful claim?

A.  Documentation is everything when it concerns receiving a fair settlement from an insurance company.  Your medical providers will keep records of all visits and treatments for your injury, but you should record the ways your injury has impacted your personal and work life.  Only you can testify to the pain you feel, the limitations you have in your workplace, home life, personal relationships, and recreational activities.  Record all of these things as well as all activities you find that you can no longer engage in and other ways your injury has impacted your life.

Writing down your observations of injuries and losses when they are fresh in your mind will allow you to recall a greater number of details, and details mean compensation.  No one else will do this for you.

Q.  Why should I hire a personal injury lawyer after having been injured in a car, truck, or workplace accident?

A.  The Insurance Research Council (a non-profit group funded by insurance companies across the nation) conducted a study called “Paying for Auto Injuries” which compared personal injury claims processed by the injured person alone versus those handled by a personal injury lawyer.  The study found that those injured persons who were represented by an attorney received over 300% more money in the end – even after attorney fees and costs were subtracted from the total amount of the settlement or jury award.  For more information, see our free report “Why the Insurance Company Doesn’t Want You to Hire a Lawyer.”

Q.  Don’t all lawyers know how to successfully represent an injured person?

A.  Personal injury law has many complexities and requires an understanding of not only tort and insurance law, but litigation and trial procedures and of how insurance companies operate that a general practitioner may not possess.

Additionally, well-experienced personal injury attorneys understand how particular factors will influence the value of a claim.  Comparative negligence issues (who was at fault, and to what degree), punitive damage issues, and pre-existing medical conditions of the claimant will also factor into the value of a claim.  A serious personal injury attorney will have access to resources that give them up-to-date information about the claim value of various types of injuries.

One size does not fit all in the practice of law.  Just as you would not seek treatment from a family practice physician for a traumatic brain injury, you should be equally careful in hiring a lawyer who has extensive experience representing injured people and working with insurance companies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

State Funds for West Virginia Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Victims

Spinal cord and traumatic brain injuries can be devastating, both physically and financially. For some people, insurance will satisfy their needs; for other people, a lawsuit may provide the compensation that they require to take care of themselves. If those two sources are not available, however, there is another place that injured people can turn to in West Virginia.

The West Virginia Traumatic Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Fund was created to help individuals pay for rehabilitation services after suffering serious brain or spinal cord injuries. The stated goal of the fund is to increase opportunities for individuals and help them achieve some measure of independence so they can return to a more productive lifestyle.

More specifically, the fund was set up to assist individuals with obtaining and paying for services such as:

  • Rehabilitation-related therapies
  • Attendant care
  • Home modifications to aid accessibility
  • Necessary medical equipment or medical devices
  • Counseling and support services for individuals and their families

Of course, individuals must meet certain qualifications in order to receive assistance from the fund. For instance, the program is only available to citizens of West   Virginia. In addition, the fund is available as a “payer of last resort,” which means that the fund can only be used for individuals who have been denied insurance benefits and have applied to and been denied by all other agencies that are mandated to provide similar services to injured individuals.

Once someone has been denied benefits from those sources, the board that controls the fund will determine if any other agencies could provide services. If there are no other viable options, the fund can be used to provide services for the injured person.

While this fund provides a type of safety net for individuals who have suffered traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, the most direct way of achieving the services and compensation you need is still through a lawsuit against the responsible party, or through benefits from your insurance carrier. To find out more about your options, speak with a personal injury lawyer.

If you need help after a serious car or work accident, please visit http://www.robinettelaw.com for articles, resources, and advice or call our office (304)594-1800 for the help you need today.

Charleston Rental House Fire Kills Two Adults and Seven Children

Early Saturday, a quick-burning fire in a rental house caused the deaths of nine people, two adults and seven children.  This was one of the most horrific fires in the history of Charleston.  All of the victims likely died of smoke inhalation.

According to West Virginia MetroNews, Charleston Mayor Danny Jones and investigators say the fire moved quickly through the house on Arlington Ave. putting out a lot of smoke. Fire investigators were back at the house on Sunday working to determine the cause of the blaze. The investigation will continue on Monday.

A child, who initially survived the fire, died Sunday at a Charleston hospital when he was taken off life support. His death brings the death toll to nine.  All of the children were no older than eight years old.

Alisha Carter-Camp, also known as Lisa Carter, perished in the blaze at a two story house she rented with her sister Latasha Jones Isabell, 24, on Arlington Avenue in Charleston.

Isabell says she was outside smoking a cigarette at just after 3 a.m. Saturday morning when she noticed the blaze and ran to a neighbor’s house for help.

The fire killed Carter-Camp, her children, Keahna Camp, 8, and Jeremiah Camp, 3. It’s believed they were sleeping upstairs in the house. Another son, Bryan Timothy Camp, 7, was pulled out of the home by firefighters but died Sunday morning.

The blaze also killed Alex Seal, and his twin daughters, Kiki and Gigi, both 3.

Isabell’s two sons also were killed. They are identified as Elijah Scott, 3, and Emanuel Jones, 3.

“When the units came on the scene there was already a fire here. We had one adult female on the outside (Isabell) telling us there were people inside,” Charleston Assistant Fire Chief Bob Sharp said.

The first city fire crews were on the scene within two minutes, but the house was already full of flames and heavy smoke.

Arson Not Suspected in Charleston Fire:

Arson is not primarily suspected as a cause of this fire.  “We haven’t ruled it out. It doesn’t appear to be that way, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not,” Charleston Fire Dept. Lt. Ken Tyree said this weekend.

Sometimes the destruction caused by the flames makes it more difficult for investigators to find out how a particular fire began, but Lt. Tyree says he doesn’t believe that will be the case with this fire.

“It was a fast-burning fire. There’s a lot still intact so we feel confident we’ll be able to do well in the aspect of having an origin and hopefully a cause,” Tyree said.

The fire dept. was getting assistance from the state Fire Marshal’s Office and ATF. A specially trained dog was due on the scene Saturday evening.

Only One Smoke Detector in Rental House:

There were only two smoke detectors in the house. One was reportedly improperly installed under a cabinet and the other was not working.

A building inspector with the City of Charleston planned to inspect the house less than a month ago.

Mayor Danny Jones says the inspection was scheduled for Feb. 28 as part of routine inspections the office does at rental units. He says the inspector had permission from the owner of the Arlington Ave. house, Delores Shamblin. He says Alisha Carter-Camp, one of the adults who lived there, knew about it, but it didn’t happen.

“Had we been able to get in that day and had we seen the fact that they did not have the proper number of smoke detectors, we might have saved a lot of lives,” Jones said.

A criminal investigation is underway.  Landlords have a legal and moral duty to their tenants to maintain a safe living environment in their rental homes.  City code requires rentals to have smoke detectors in every bedroom and in hallways close to bedrooms.

Morgantown Residents Take Note:

Morgantown residents and students need to take note of the horrific destruction and loss of life that can result from fire.  Morgantown police and fire departments reported over 35 intentionally-set street and dumpster fires over St. Patrick’s Day weekend, and three additional fires set last week.  As we see in the case of the Charleston house fire, just one out-of-control fire can cause unimaginable destruction and devastation.

Lt. Tyree of the Charleston Fire Department says there’s a tragic lesson to be learned from the blaze in Charleston. He says residents need to do all they can to prevent a fire.

For more information regarding this fire, please visit http://www.wvmetronews.com.  For information regarding another tragic Charleston wrongful death incident that could have been avoided through use of working detectors, see our previous blog about the carbon monoxide deaths at a Charleston hotel.

Cars of the Future at L.A. Auto Show – New Car Accident Prevention Safety Features

New Cadillac Features Accident Prevention TechnologyAt this year’s L.A. Auto Show, carmakers highlighted safety features that focus on preventing accidents rather than merely surviving them.

Warning indicators for blind spots and rearview cameras have become common, but many manufacturers are taking the technologies a step further.

The additional features act on the safety warnings when a driver fails to do so, said Jeremy Anwyl, chief executive of online auto research firm Edmunds Inc.

“I think they are too easy to ignore,” he said of the warnings. “If your car has a whole series of these different lights flashing and buzzers, it is too much to process in a panic moment.”

Lane Departure Prevention – Cars that Self-Correct Driver Errors:

Infiniti presented one solution with its Infiniti JX, unveiled last week at the auto show. The JX boasts the world’s first backup collision intervention technology. Like existing backup sensors, the system beeps if it detects potential obstacles while the vehicle is in reverse. But now, if the driver does not respond, the system automatically brakes to prevent a collision.

“We initiated this technology in the industry,” said Kyle Bazemore, senior manager of Infiniti product communications. He said Infiniti also pioneered other proactive safety systems.

“We were the first to have lane-departure prevention — if you’re drifting out of your lane, it’ll automatically nudge you back in,” he said. “Also blind-spot intervention — if you move with something in your blind spot it also nudges you back.”

Inflatable Seat Belts and Virtual Bumper Systems:

The new Ford Explorer on display at the auto show also integrates lane-departure technology. In addition, the Explorer features inflatable seat belts — a first in the industry — designed to reduce chest and neck injuries. Other safety options include blind-spot warnings and an automatic parallel-parking system.

“In the industry, the technologies are all already there,” said Cadillac spokesman David Caldwell. “The difference is what you tell these systems to do.”

One way Cadillac’s new XTS adopted these technologies is with its virtual bumper feature.

“For example, in a dark, low-speed place, like a parking garage with columns and pillars,” Caldwell said, “if you’re about to hit something, behind you or in front of you, the virtual bumper will alert the driver and apply full braking up to 25 mph.”

The XTS also offers a collision mitigation braking system that, simply put, understands and interprets the pressure the driver applies to the brake. So if the system feels a panicked stomp, the electronic brakes will intervene and help avoid nearby objects detected by sensors placed around the car.

Increased Air Bag Protection:

The new Scion iQ, the world’s smallest four-seater, has the most airbags in the industry, according to a spokeswoman at the carmaker’s auto show exhibit. The iQadded a rear-window airbag, an industry first, totaling 11 for the compact car.

The Cadillac XTS also added an airbag between the driver and front passenger seat, giving the vehicle a total of 10 airbags.

“It’s about as many as you can add without turning it into a pillow,” Caldwell said.

Airbags aside, Volvo spokesman James Hope summed up what safety means for future cars: “It’s the whole idea of intuitive technology.”

Pedestrian, Animal, and Bicycle Detection Features:

Four U.S. Volvo models currently offer an active pedestrian detection system. The vehicle automatically brakes if the driver does not react to pedestrians detected by the radar. The car fully brakes up to 25 mph.

“What’s coming in the near future for Volvo, we’re talking 2014, is animal detection,” Hope said. “In Sweden, for example, there’s a big problem with elk and moose. The full weight of this animal coming through the windshield can kill occupants.”

The new Cadillac XTS has sensors and cameras that can also detect if cyclists or pedestrians are approaching from the side. The system alerts the driver of this side traffic by vibrating the seat cushion on the corresponding side.

What’s Next?  Cars that Communicate with Each Other for Accident Prevention:

What else is next? Anwyl said there eventually would be technology that enables cars to adapt to surrounding vehicles and prevent potential collisions.

“Cars will be able to communicate so each car knows what to do,” he said. “The technology is here. It’s just a few years off.”

Volvo is among the automakers already thinking in that direction. It’s working on a concept it calls “platooning,” Hope said.

“You have the lead car, and the car behind it drives to the tune of the car ahead,” he said. “This increases efficiency and safety — cars can drive closer together safely.”

The Cadillac XTS already offers a speed-range adaptive cruise control, enabling drivers to set a following distance from the car in front of them. Caldwell said this was a useful bonus for Angelenos driving on crowded freeways in stop-and-go traffic.

“This kind of technology is hugely useful because it doesn’t require that you pay full attention,” Anwyl said. “We are right at the beginning of what I think is going to be a huge wave of these features and it’s really all based on advanced technologies. Computers, processors are all getting to the point now where they can handle a vast amount of information and turn that information around.”

“In the end, it’s about helping the driver see better,” Caldwell said. “We don’t want to take over the driver, but we do want to assist the driver.”

Source:  Rosanna Xia, Los Angeles Times:  rosanna.xia@latimes.com

If you have been injured in a car accident and you need answers, please visit http://www.robinettelaw.com or call one of our accident lawyers at (304)594-1800 today.

Car Wreck on I-79: Rear End Collision of Pontiac and Large Dump Truck

On March 12, 2012, a large dump truck collided with a small, blue Pontiac on I-79 near Morgantown, WV.  The driver of the Pontiac was taken by ambulance to Ruby Memorial Hospital.  The driver of the dump truck did not seek immediate medical attention.  The cause of the accident is unknown, but compare the result of the impact in the images of the Pontiac versus the dump truck.  The extreme difference in the appearance of the two vehicles after the wreck should encourage drivers to buckle up - your car will always be the loser in a collision with a heavy-weight truck.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Images from The Dominion Post, Morgantown, WV

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.